April 16, 2025

New SEC Rules Could Lift Suppression on ‘Meme Stocks’

28 thoughts on “New SEC Rules Could Lift Suppression on ‘Meme Stocks’

  1. What is your opinion on them using the same threshold numbers as 2008 and 2009? Considering inflation, this is good news for retail investors, right?
    I found on Gary Gensler’s tweet mentioning the rule, this comment: (Do you have any comments on these, in my opinion, good questions?)where are the Loop holes? What are the short comings? Who will enforce the rule? What are the penalties for non compliance? Essentially Where will the slithering snakes and cock roaches hide in darkness?
    It mentions how this rule will help break the abusive trade practice of bringing about short squeezes. But how can one not occur if this rule is passed, since we know they’re so many shorts? I expect it would be one of the last?
    Lastly, does it say in the pdf what the punishments are for not reporting or reporting incorrectly?

  2. With all due Respect,

    SEC needs to (halt) turn off the dark pools; we want fair and real price discovery in our market. You have the rules enforce it.

    It’s not a fair market when corrupt hedge funds and the major brokers have dark pools they can
    manipulate a companies stock price.

    We are loosing innovation companies and jobs to make Hedge Funds like Cramer and Citadel rich. And they brag about it, insult to injury

    The Failed to Deliver shares is evidence that shares are being sold and failed to deliver. For the size of the floats they are high.

    There is no way for us to know how many phantom shares exist. Crooks use the old Shell Game.
    End Dark Pools end the Shell Game. Bring back a fair in the light market for future investors.

  3. “It is long overdue that the Department of Justice is now looking into this,” Christian said. “I believe this is the largest commercial fraud in U.S. history. It makes the Bernie Madoff scheme look like a gnat on an elephant’s behind.”

  4. Simply put, naked short selling is one massive embezzlement scheme that for years has mostly gone ignored.

  5. This new rule is a great beginning. However, the article provides no indication of enforcement or penalty for violating the rule. And if there is no penalty, then the rule is effectively meaningless, at least until some short seller faces the music, and is subjected to an actual penalty for violation.

  6. If this is true load up on RAD , 26% short, 24b revenue with less then 500m market cap with only 55m shares, makes no sense.

  7. Thanks for the information, I will pass it along. I’ve been holding for a year now and i will hold for another year if I have to. Thanks again, Keep up the good work.

  8. You always have great breakdown’s of whatever topic to are covering. Thanks again for the interpretation of the DD. AMC LETS GOOOOO!

  9. what would a managed short squeeze look like? any stock ever experience something like this before for reference?

  10. Great stuff. Appreciate the thoughful concise explanation. Let’s pray enforcement matches protocol. TBD

    1. Been buying and holding for a year now almost. Things are looking better by the day. Thanks for the info and keep up the hard work.

Comments are closed.