Tag: Market Manipulation (Page 1 of 13)

TD Bank Now Gets Caught With Illegal Market Manipulation

TD Bank now gets caught with illegal market manipulation and has agreed to pay over $20 million under a deal with the SEC.

Investors are calling it ‘pay to play’.

The U.S. broker-dealer unit of Toronto Dominion Bank (TD Securities USA) has agreed to pay more than $20 million to resolve allegations of manipulating the U.S. Treasuries market.

This settlement comes as part of an agreement with U.S. authorities, concluding a lengthy investigation, per Reuters.

In a court filing on Monday, TD Securities admitted to engaging in spoofing practices within the U.S. Treasuries market as part of a deal with the U.S. Justice Department.

The firm also settled related civil charges with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Additionally, the bank faced charges for not properly supervising its former head of the U.S. Treasuries trading desk.

From April 2018 to May 2019, a former employee manipulated the U.S. Treasury cash securities market by placing orders he had no intention of executing, a tactic known as “spoofing.”

This practice aims to create a misleading impression of market demand.

U.S. regulators have taken a strong stance against spoofing, which is designed to distort market activity.

However, the criminal bank has now been let go off what investors deem as ‘easily’.

Under the terms of TD’s agreement, the Justice Department will refrain from prosecuting the firm as long as it adheres to the three-year agreement and implements significant compliance improvements.

The DOJ decided not to appoint a third-party monitor for compliance, based on the company’s efforts to address the issues.

As part of the settlement, TD Securities will pay a $12.5 million criminal penalty related to civil investigations by the SEC and the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (FINRA).

This amount is in addition to an approximately $9.5 million criminal penalty outlined in the agreement.

The bank will also compensate victims with $4.7 million and forfeit $1.4 million.

This settlement comes at a time when the Canadian bank is reportedly on the verge of pleading guilty to separate charges concerning its U.S. retail bank’s alleged failure to prevent money laundering linked to Chinese crime groups and illegal fentanyl sales, as reported by the Wall Street Journal last week.

For more US Bank News and updates like this, join the newsletter or opt-in for push notifications.

Also Read: TD Bank Customers Now Say They Cannot Access Their Money

Other Regulation News Today

Market News Today - TD Bank Now Gets Caught With Illegal Market Manipulation.
Market News Today – TD Bank Now Gets Caught With Illegal Market Manipulation.

Illegal short sellers will now face life sentence in prison after the National Assembly approved the amendment.

The National Assembly has approved an amendment to the Capital Markets Act aimed at enhancing penalties for illegal short selling, per Business Korea.

Under this new law, individuals who profit illegally from short selling exceeding 5 billion won (around $3.79 million) could face severe penalties, including prison sentences of up to life imprisonment.

On September 27, financial authorities confirmed that the amendment, designed to overhaul the short selling system, passed the National Assembly on September 26.

The legislation mandates that institutional investors must establish an electronic short selling system, and both institutional and corporate investors are now required to implement internal control standards.

Approximately 101 companies, representing 92% of domestic short selling transactions, must adopt these electronic systems.

These firms will also be obligated to report stock balances and over-the-counter (OTC) transactions to the exchange, increasing their compliance responsibilities under the newly instituted central monitoring system.

Securities firms will need to annually verify the internal controls and electronic systems of institutional and corporate investors, following a checklist, and report the findings to the Financial Supervisory Service (FSS).

Non-compliance could result in fines of up to 100 million won.

To standardize short selling conditions for individual and institutional investors, the repayment period for loan transactions related to short selling will also be constrained.

Violations of this rule will incur fines of up to 100 million won, with loan terms extendable in 90-day increments for a maximum of 12 months.

Additionally, the amendment seeks to deter repeated illegal short selling by increasing administrative penalties.

Fines for unfair trading and illegal short selling will rise from three to five times the illicit profit to four to six times.

Offenders earning over 5 billion won from illegal short selling may now face the same enhanced prison terms as those engaging in unfair trading.

Administrative sanctions will be broadened, allowing regulators to restrict trading of financial investment products for up to five years and limit the appointment or reappointment of executives at listed companies.

This aims to tackle the high recidivism rate among financial criminals by effectively barring them from the market for a specified duration.

To combat the concealment of illegal profits, accounts suspected of being involved in unfair trading or illegal short selling can be frozen for up to six months, with a possible extension of an additional six months.

The amended law will take effect on March 31 of next year, providing time for the implementation of the electronic short selling system, which is expected to be operational by then.

However, restrictions on trading financial products and executive appointments will begin six months after the law is enacted, following public consultations.

Upcoming revisions to the enforcement decree will lower the short selling disclosure threshold from 0.5% to 0.01% of outstanding shares and reduce the collateral ratio for individual short sellers to match that of institutional investors, with completion expected by next month.

A representative from the Financial Services Commission (FSC) noted that limiting the loan repayment period for short selling transactions to 12 months, along with finalizing amendments to the Financial Investment Business Regulations, will lower the collateral ratio for individual short sellers from 120% to 105%, leveling the playing field.

The FSC official added, “With the electronic short selling system set to launch in March, the improvements to the short selling framework will be fully realized.

Our goal is to restore investor confidence and enhance the competitiveness of the South Korean stock market.”

For more Market News and updates like this, join the newsletter or opt-in for push notifications.

Also Read: Glitch Now Traps Hedge Funds In A Massive Short Squeeze

Market News Published Daily 📰

Market News Today - TD Bank Now Gets Caught With Illegal Market Manipulation.
Market News Today – TD Bank Now Gets Caught With Illegal Market Manipulation.

Don’t forget to opt-in for push notifications so you don’t miss a single article!

Be sure to share this article with your community.

Also, thank you to all of our site sponsors.

This year we’ve been able to increase push notifications slots making it more convenient than ever for new readers to receive their daily market news and updates.

Our readers can now donate $3 per month to support independent journalism.

For daily news and updates on your favorite stories, opt-in for push notifications.

Follow Frank Nez on X (Twitter)Instagram, or Facebook.



Why Did FINRA Halt the Trading of MMTLP?

Why Did FINRA halt trading of Meta Materials?
Market News: Why Did FINRA halt MMTLP?

FINRA halted $MMTLP in December without notice leaving investors confused and angry.

The regulator blatantly proved to be one of the biggest obstructions in the market when it also failed to deliver investors with Meta Materials’ planned distribution of its preferred stock.

Now shareholders are demanding FINRA release a statement regarding the events that occurred with MMTLP.

The last day to purchase shares (and be eligible for their dividend) was Dec. 8, 2022.

Meta Material’s final trading day was Dec. 12, 2022.

The distribution date of the private Next Bridge Hydrocarbon shares was Dec. 14, 2022.

Shareholders never received the proposed preferred shares.

So, why did FINRA halt the trading of Meta Materials / MMTLP and delist the security leaving several investors questioning the integrity of our regulators?

Here’s what the regulator said.

FINRA Comments on MMTLP Halts

Meta Materials
Why did FINRA halt Meta Materials?

“Effective Friday, December 09, 2022, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) halted trading and quoting in the Series A preferred shares of Meta Materials Inc. (OTC Symbol: MMTLP).

Pursuant to Rule 6440(a)(3), FINRA has determined that an extraordinary event has occurred or is ongoing that has caused or has the potential to cause significant uncertainty in the settlement and clearance process for shares in MMTLP and that, therefore, halting trading and quoting in MMTLP is necessary to protect investors and the public interest.

The trading and quoting halt will end concurrent with the deletion of the symbol effective Tuesday, December 13, 2022.”

“See also Form S1 Registration Statement for Next Bridge Hydrocarbons, Inc. stating that…immediately after the Spin-Off, all shares of Series A Non-Voting Preferred Stock of Meta shall be cancelled. Available here.”

In simple terms, FINRA’s only explanation was that the halt was due to ‘uncertainty’ in the settlement process which could harm investors and public interest.

And perhaps that’s true — though I don’t think they were referring to retail investors at all, but rather FINRA’s private investors and partners.

Tinfoil hat on, you tell me.

Related: The Retail Community Says FINRA is Corrupt

Who is FINRA?

Why did FINRA halt MMTLP? Why did FINRA halt Meta Materials?
Why did FINRA halt MMTLP? Why did FINRA halt Meta Materials?

FINRA stands for the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority and is a self-regulatory government organization that oversees U.S. broker-dealers.

The organization contains records of every trade made available intraday, including that of naked short sales.

FINRA requires firms to be able to meet their short sale requirements as well as have a process to close out fails to deliver within their required timeframes.

However, they’re the open window that allows these manipulative strategies to occur in the market.

FTDS (fails-to-deliver) are mounting up every month according to SEC data, and FINRA is unable to get firms to close out these obligations.

The retail community is calling it foul play, alleging the possibility of lobbying within the self-regulated organization.

FINRA’s mission statement:

At FINRA, our mission is clear—to protect investors and promote market integrity. At FINRA, our mission is clear—to protect investors and promote market integrity. Each year, we conduct thousands of investigations of potential violations of securities industry rules, regulations and U.S. securities laws.

So, who’s watching FINRA?

Justice for the MMTLP community must be served.

Market News Published Daily 📰

Market News Today –

Don’t forget to opt-in for push notifications so you don’t miss a single article!

Be sure to share this article with your community.

Also, thank you to all of our site sponsors.

This year we’ve been able to increase push notifications slots making it more convenient than ever for new readers to receive their daily market news and updates.

Our readers can now donate $3 per month to support independent journalism.

For daily news and updates on your favorite stories, opt-in for push notifications.

Follow Frank Nez on X (Twitter)Instagram, or Facebook.



Regulators Strengthen Punishment for Naked Short Selling

Market News Today - Regulators Strengthen Punishment for Naked Short Selling.
Market News Today – Regulators Strengthen Punishment for Naked Short Selling.

(BK) The Securities and Futures Commission of the Financial Services Commission imposed a pecuniary penalty of 6.05 billion won (US$4.58 million) on two securities companies that committed naked short selling.

The Financial Investment Services and Capital Markets Act of South Korea was revised in April 2021 so that illegal short sellers will face pecuniary penalties instead of fines.

The two companies have become the first such case.

Today, naked short selling is illegal in South Korea, unlike covered short selling.

Investors in the United States have raised naked short selling concerns on social media, urging the Securities and Exchange Commission to model the practice of nations such as South Korea.

Previously, illegal short selling in the South Korean stock market was detected infrequently and violators could go almost unpunished.

This is because the maximum fine according to the act before the revision was 100 million won (US$75,694).

According to the amended act, the maximum pecuniary penalty is equal to the amount of illegal short selling.

In addition, violation may lead to at least one year in prison or a fine equivalent to 300 to 500 percent of the illegal profit or avoided loss.

This model is raising attention in the United States as the predatorial practice has dominated the industry for decades.

Naked Short Selling in America

Market News Today - Regulators Strengthen Punishment for Naked Short Selling.
Market News Today – Regulators Strengthen Punishment for Naked Short Selling.

Today, naked short selling in the American markets is given a blind eye.

Retail investors believe U.S. regulators to be complicit in the market injustices that occur on a daily basis.

(Singapore) Genius Group (NYSEAMERICAN:GNS) CEO Roger Hamilton has led CEOs to take legal action against naked short selling in the market.

He recently shared a petition on social media to end naked short selling in efforts to raise awareness of the illegal short selling strategy.

Naked shorting is the illegal practice of short selling shares that have not been affirmatively determined to exist, per Investopedia.

The predatorial practice allows short sellers to short a stock without there actually being any stock available to short.

In 2015, The SEC approved the use of naked short selling on IPOs although it was deemed an illegal practice in 2010.

Roger Hamilton says he noticed something was wrong in his company stock after shares would plummet despite his company having strong fundamentals and funding.

This is when he began to speak publicly about what was happening to his company.

Another public figure who has spoken out against naked short selling is Jon Stewart.

Regulators have always had the power to stop the manipulation happening in our stock market but have created rules that cater primarily to hedge funds.

“The Game is Rigged” Says Ex-Citadel Data Scientist

Patrick McConlogue, an ex-Citadel Data Scientist said during the ‘meme stock’ frenzy that the stock market is rigged, claiming he helped design it.

“The game is not fair and it never has been. Individual investors, even when operating in a swarm, are destined to lose. How do I know? I helped design the game.”

The dilemma here is that institutions are able to get away with the ‘capitalism’ card every time an issue is brought to their attention.

SEC Chairman Gensler has said that the SEC cannot completely interfere with the industry due to a company’s capitalistic rights in America.

Which makes sense through a capitalistic view, however, there should be tougher laws in certain sectors and industries, especially those that have the power to create massive economic downturns.

Regulators in other countries have strengthened the punishment for naked short selling for a reason — the manipulation creates systemic risk.

The question is, how many times will the U.S have to see the collapse of markets and our economy to understand this?

Other countries have recognized these fallacies in their market, maybe it’s time the U.S does the same.

Related: ‘We The Investors’ Challenges Wall Street on New SEC Proposals

Market News Published Daily

Market News Today - Regulators Strengthen Punishment for Naked Short Selling.
Market News Today – Regulators Strengthen Punishment for Naked Short Selling.

For stock market, business news and updates, join the newsletter to receive weekly market news and notifications straight to your inbox.

Franknez.com is the media site that keeps retail investors informed.

You can also follow Frank Nez on TwitterInstagramFacebook, or LinkedIn for daily posts.


Franknez.com

You can now read exclusive FrankNez articles for only $1/mo.

  • Gain access to EXCLUSIVE FrankNez articles you won’t find here.
  • Become part of a private and safe Discord community, just for retail investors.
  • Get drawn at the end of the year for holiday giveaways.

My New Book is Out Now! Use Code: THENEZ


Citadel Has a Long History of Market Manipulation

Citadel Market Manipulation
Market News: Citadel and friends are entering the crypto space | Ken Griffin.

Ken Griffin and friends are entering the crypto world very soon — investors are concerned as Citadel has a history of several violations and fines.

EDX Markets plans to bring ‘traditional finance’ to the crypto space, a not so ‘traditional’ space to begin with.

The exchange made up of Citadel, Sequoia, Paradigm, Virtu, Charles Schwab, and Fidelity is debuting in November.

EDX Markets will start trading a limited number of spot, crypto tokens starting with a November trial period, with the official launch in January, per Bloomberg.

Similar to trading equities and options, EDX will allow investors to buy and sell digital assets through their existing broker dealer, rather than an outside venue or directly through a crypto-native exchange. 

“We’re taking some of the best features of traditional finance and bringing it to the digital markets to make it more efficient, and bring that cost saving to investors,” Nazarali said.

Nazarali is the former global head of business development at Citadel Securities.

But as many are aware, these financial institutions have a long history of playing unfair.

Will these sharks taint the crypto space too?

Let’s look at Citadel’s market manipulation history as well as other Citadel violations and fines in the past.

Franknez.com

Welcome to Franknez.com – if you haven’t joined the newsletter, be sure to do that below. I’m publishing market news and updates daily.

Let’s dive right into it!

Join the newsletter to become part of an activist group fighting for market transparency!

Receive weekly market news and articles like this to stay up to date.

Citadel Market Manipulation

Citadel Fines and market manipulation.
Citadel violation and fines – market manipulation.

2015

In 2015, an account operated in China by the brokerage arm of US hedge fund Citadel was suspended.

It was the latest casualty of regulators’ hunt for market manipulators and short sellers at the time.

The China Securities Regulatory Commission said that the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges had suspended 24 accounts as part of a probe into high-frequency trading.

The investigation focused on a practice known as “spoofing” in which an investor submits a buy or sell order but then withdraws it before a sale is completed — a practice that can mislead investors by creating the false impression that a stock is trading at a particular price.

Citadel confirmed that one of its accounts managed by Guosen Futures was among those suspended.

2017

SEC Citadel

In 2017 Citadel was fined by the SEC $22.6 million to settle charges of misleading conduct.

The hedge fund misled customers about the way it priced trades.

The SEC found that between 2007 and 2010, Citadel used two algorithms to execute stock trades on customers’ behalf that gave investors a worse price for their trades, even when Citadel knew better prices existed elsewhere.

“This affected millions of retail orders,” said Stephanie Avakian, the acting director of enforcement at the SEC at the time.

Citadel neither admitted nor denied the findings.

2021

Citadel violations and fines.
Citadel violations and fines – market manipulation.

In 2021, Failure-to-Delivers (FTDs) rose dramatically in the period leading up to January 28th, 2021, a phenomenon consistent with increasing short interest by market makers such as Citadel Securities.

FTDs are indictive of naked short selling, which occurs when a short seller does not actually possess the security it is supposed to borrow.

This practice is largely inaccessible to individual investors but accessible to market makers.

At the time, Citadel, Robinhood, and others restricted retail investors from buying ‘meme stocks’ in order to prevent escalating institutional losses.

Citadel eventually lost billions after betting against AMC Entertainment in 2021.

But the entire system needs a refresh – The DTCC waived a total of $9.7 billion of collateral deposit requirements on January 28, 2021, saving brokers, and screwing up retail investors.

2022

The Chicago Tribune published a piece explaining exactly what retail investors have been warning the SEC about.

Citadel Securities’ dark pool dominates a big part of the financial world, accounting for as much as half of U.S. stock market activity.

The Chicago Tribune says this prominent dark pool is run by Chicago Billionaire Ken Griffin’s Citadel Securities and has been targeting small scale retail investors.

And they’re not wrong.

Dark pools are typically involved in payment for order flow (PFOF), where they pay broker firms to receive retail order flow.

Brokers such as Robinhood and TD Ameritrade accept payment for order flow.

But retail investors have been bringing these nefarious practices in the market to light.

Related: Biotech Company Suing Citadel Over Market Manipulation

Leave a comment below

Leave your thoughts in the comment section below.

Be sure to join my newsletter for more market news and updates.

You Can Follow Me On: Twitter | Facebook | Instagram


Support your favorite blog for only $4/mo.

Your support helps maintain all the costs it takes to run a blog at this scale.

The mission of this platform is to spread the truth majority of corporate media isn’t willing to, by giving the people in our community a voice.

Your dedicated support keeps this platform going and growing.

Thank you for being a reader.

– Frank Nez


95% of Retail Orders Don’t Go Through Lit Exchange

Gary Gensler says 90%-95% of retail orders don't go through lit exchange
Gary Gensler says 90%-95% of retail orders don’t go through lit exchange.

Gary Gensler announced exclusively on Bloomberg (see below) that 90-95% of retail orders don’t go through the lit exchange.

The SEC Commissioner says these orders are rerouted to dark pools rather than the NYSE.

It was only a year after the ‘meme stock’ frenzy that the community receives this official news.

The ‘ape’ community has been labeled as conspiracy theorists but have proven to be correct time and time again on the market injustices that have been occurring for decades.

Here’s the latest market news.

Franknez.com

Welcome to Franknez.com – Gary Gensler has confirmed the market manipulation that the ‘ape’ community has been exposing all for years now.

This is big for the retail community because for some time, ‘smart money’ was referring to investors as conspiracy theorists.

And can the SEC suspend dark pool trading?

Let’s dive right into it.

Gary Gensler on Dark Pools via Bloomberg

Gary Gensler confirms 90%-95% or retail orders are processed in dark pools

SEC Chairman and Commissioner Gary Gensler says payment for order flow is partly the reason why orders aren’t processed on the lit exchange.

He says retail orders go to wholesalers on an order-by-order competition.

Citadel’s Ken Griffin has praised PFOF stating it’s good for retail investors.

However, PFOF allows market makers to process retails orders in the ‘dark markets’, or dark pools.

This means retail buying volume is out of sync with AMC’s actual share price.

AMC’s share price is synthetic, it only reflects a small portion of buying volume.

Market Makers Have Been Stealing from Retail Investors

Market makers have been stealing from retail investors with absolutely no consequence from regulators.

Now that the cat is out of the hat, what is going to be done about it?

How does one account for all the orders that have been derailed from the lit exchange market and fix the share price to reflect the correct amount?

Banning PFOF is one thing but what about the money that has been masked by dark pools?

Will these financial institutions be held accountable for financial treason?

The integrity of the stock market has been tainted for far too long, now it’s time to take action.

Will PFOF get banned in the U.S?

Will PFOF get banned in the United States?
Will PFOF get banned in the United States?

According to Gary Gensler, PFOF is banned in the UK, Canada, Australia, and in Europe.

However, because the U.S has a very strong capitalist economy, it could prove to be difficult.

Gensler says, “I think it’s natural that we look to say, how do we drive great competition and efficiency in this market, and use the tools that congress has given us.”

Here the SEC Chairman is saying their solution is to find someone who can compete with these market makers rather than banning PFOF in general.

We’ve seen these efforts through the IEX exchange D-Limit order.

IEX is a lit exchange that reflects much more accurate share prices and eliminates the predatorial strategies used by market makers and hedge funds.

These strategies include PFOF and high frequency trading.

Recently, Citadel, Charles Schwab, and the NYSE have teamed up to destroy new SEC Proposals.

However, ‘We The Investors’ has challenged Wall Street by submitting more than 1,300 letters supporting the SEC’s proposals.

Retail Wants Orders Processed Through the Lit Exchange

The SEC is supposed to be protecting retail investors from nefarious market practices.

Therefore, it is the SEC’s duty to find a solution and locate the money that retail is missing.

Retail wants orders processed through the lit exchange.

Market makers do not have the consent to move retail money through dark pools or other foreign markets.

#MarketMakersDontHaveConsent

Can the SEC Suspend Dark Pools?

Yes, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has the authority to suspend dark pools if it believes that they are violating securities laws or posing a risk to investors or the integrity of the markets.

Dark pools are private trading venues that allow institutional investors to buy and sell large blocks of securities without revealing their trading intentions to the public.

While dark pools can provide benefits such as reducing market impact and improving execution quality, they can also raise concerns about transparency and fairness.

The SEC has taken action in the past to regulate dark pools and address potential abuses.

For example, in 2014, the SEC brought charges against a major dark pool operator for making false statements to investors about the operation of its trading platform, leading to a $12 million settlement.

In 2020, the SEC proposed rules that would increase transparency and disclosure requirements for dark pools.

If the SEC determines that a dark pool is engaged in unlawful activities or poses a risk to investors or the markets, it can suspend the dark pool’s operations, require it to take remedial actions, or take other enforcement actions as appropriate.

Market News Published Daily

Market News Today - Can the SEC suspend dark pools?
Market News Today – Can the SEC suspend dark pools?

For stock market, business news and updates, join the newsletter to receive weekly market news and notifications straight to your inbox.

Franknez.com is the media site that keeps retail investors informed.

You can also follow Frank Nez on TwitterInstagramFacebook, or LinkedIn for daily posts.


Franknez.com

You can now read exclusive FrankNez articles for only $1/mo.

  • Gain access to EXCLUSIVE FrankNez articles you won’t find here.
  • Become part of a private and safe Discord community, just for retail investors.
  • Get drawn at the end of the year for holiday giveaways.

My New Book is Out Now! Use Code: THENEZ


« Older posts

© 2024 FrankNez

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑