Investors will now receive restitution for Robinhood’s halts of meme stocks in 2021 who were affected by cancelled trades and reentered at inferior prices.
Business Times reports that Robinhood has agreed to pay a whopping $29.75 million to end its probes with self-regulatory agency FINRA.
These investigations highlighted significant shortcomings, including Robinhood’s failure to adequately address “red flags” indicating potential misconduct.
On March 7, FINRA announced that Robinhood would pay a $26 million civil fine along with $3.75 million in restitution to customers.
This resolution comes in light of serious accusations against the brokerage, which include violations of numerous regulatory rules.
Specifically, FINRA criticized Robinhood for not implementing effective anti-money laundering programs, which resulted in the platform missing suspicious trading activities and unauthorized access to customer accounts.
Additionally, the regulator pointed out that Robinhood inadequately supervised social media influencers who promoted the company and failed to respond to multiple warnings about delays in trade processing.
One of the most significant issues arose in January 2021, when Robinhood restricted trading in “meme” stocks such as GameStop and AMC Entertainment Holdings.
This decision came at a time when hedge funds were incurring substantial losses due to a surge in retail investor interest in these stocks.
The restrictions led to a public outcry and raised questions about Robinhood’s commitment to its retail investor base.
The restitution of $3.75 million is particularly important for the retail investors affected by these practices, however, many might argue that this is not enough compared to the damages that followed the halts of these stocks.
Ex-Citadel data scientist, Patrick McConlogue says some hedge funds were able to ‘overleverage’ their positions towards the downside during the halts and make back nearly all their losses.
“The game is not fair and it never has been. Individual investors, even when operating in a swarm, are destined to lose.
How do I know? I helped design the game.”
Many customers were left in the dark about Robinhood’s controversial “collaring” of market orders, a process that resulted in certain trades being canceled and then re-entered at less favorable prices.
For these investors, the restitution may provide only a miniscule measure of relief, compensating them for the negative impact of these practices on their trading experience.
Moreover, the broader implications of this settlement cannot be understated.
The relationship between Robinhood and Citadel, a major hedge fund, has come under scrutiny, particularly regarding allegations of collusion to halt trades during critical market moments.
As retail investors rallied to buy into stocks like AMC and GameStop, hedge funds faced severe financial strains, prompting concerns about whether Robinhood prioritized the interests of institutional investors over its retail clientele.
This perceived betrayal has resulted in a significant erosion of trust among retail investors, who rely on platforms like Robinhood to facilitate fair and transparent trading.
In the aftermath of these revelations, Robinhood’s reputation has taken a hit, and the company faces the challenging task of rebuilding trust with its user base.
The small restitution payment is a step toward accountability, but it also serves as a stark reminder of the importance of robust compliance and supervision practices in the financial industry.
For retail investors, the outcome of this situation underscores the need for vigilance and advocacy in ensuring that their interests are prioritized in an increasingly complex trading landscape.
Read Daily Market News for the latest in Finance, Business, Crypto, and more for retail investors.
Follow Frank Nez on X for more community insights.
Also Read: Virtu CEO Doug Cifu is now under fire for allegedly stealing $400M from investors
Share this story.
About The Author
