
Washington, D.C. – July 24, 2025 – President Donald Trump is reportedly grappling with renewed scrutiny over his past association with Jeffrey Epstein, the late financier and convicted sex offender, according to multiple credible reports.
An inside source cited by Politico revealed that Trump expressed frustration in a recent Oval Office meeting, using profanity as he voiced concerns about being accused of “funny business” in connection with Epstein.
The source, a Republican with close ties to the White House, noted that Trump insisted he “maintained his distance” from Epstein’s criminal activities, which involved a sex-trafficking operation targeting young girls.
However, Trump reportedly lamented, “They’re going to f— me anyways,” reflecting his anxiety over the escalating controversy.
The renewed focus on Trump’s relationship with Epstein stems from recent developments, including a Wall Street Journal report confirming that Attorney General Pam Bondi informed Trump in May 2025 that his name appeared multiple times in the Justice Department’s Epstein files.
These files also mention other high-profile figures, but Trump’s inclusion has drawn significant attention.
Despite this, Trump denied having such a conversation with Bondi when questioned in July, claiming he received only a “very quick briefing” without specifics about his name in the files.
This discrepancy has fueled speculation and criticism, with Senator Chris Van Hollen (D-MD) stating on X, “Trump has known for at least TWO MONTHS that his name is in the Epstein files — and his administration refuses to release them or provide even a bit of transparency.”
Further complicating the narrative, The New York Times reported that Trump once hosted a party in the 1990s featuring “young women” where Epstein was the only other guest, highlighting the depth of their social ties in Manhattan and Palm Beach, Florida, before their relationship soured prior to Epstein’s 2008 arrest.
This report, combined with a letter Trump allegedly sent to Epstein for his 50th birthday, has intensified public and media interest in their past interactions.
Journalist Jonathan Alter, speaking on MSNBC, described the Epstein saga as a “festering wound” for Trump, noting that it has divided his base and weakened his political standing, with polls showing his approval rating dipping to 37%, a second-term low.
The Trump administration’s response has been marked by efforts to deflect attention.
On July 23, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard appeared at a White House press briefing, alleging that former President Barack Obama “conspired to subvert the will of the American people” through the 2016 Russia probe, suggesting potential prosecution.
However, this narrative has been met with skepticism, even among some conservatives.
Eli Lake, writing for The Free Press, dismissed Gabbard’s claims as lacking compelling evidence, stating they “landed with a thud” and failed to shift focus from the Epstein controversy.
Political Fallout Grows

Within the Republican Party, tensions are evident.
House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA) has faced criticism for avoiding a vote on subpoenaing Justice Department files related to Epstein, while Senator Lisa Murkowski (R-AK) expressed frustration, urging the administration to “just deal with the Epstein thing once and for all” and release the files if there is “nothing there.”
However, in a significant bipartisan move, a House Oversight and Accountability Subcommittee voted on Wednesday, July 23, 2025, to subpoena the Justice Department for files related to the investigation of Jeffrey Epstein, the disgraced financier and convicted sex offender.
Murkowski called the saga a “political distraction” that has consumed Washington’s attention.
Adding to the controversy, reports indicate that Trump administration officials have been prohibited from discussing Epstein without high-level approval, a move critics describe as an attempt to suppress information.
The Bulwark reported that Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche met with Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein’s convicted accomplice, to discuss the case, raising concerns about a potential pardon.
Dave Aronberg, a former Florida official who worked with Bondi, called the meeting “extraordinary” and suggested it could indicate a “hidden pardon” deal.
Such a move risks further alienating Trump’s base, with some supporters demanding transparency while others follow his lead in shifting focus to other issues.
The Epstein case continues to cast a shadow over Trump’s presidency, with analysts warning that its fallout could impact the 2026 midterm elections.
As Jonathan Alter noted, the controversy undermines not only Trump but also allies like Senator JD Vance, who have tied their political fortunes to him.
Meanwhile, Trump’s attempts to redirect attention—such as threatening to prosecute Obama or pushing forward with policies like mass deportations—have struggled to resonate, leaving the administration scrambling to regain control of the narrative.
As the public awaits further disclosures, calls for transparency grow louder.
Senator Sheldon Whitehouse (D-RI) accused Trump of orchestrating a “cover-up,” emphasizing the need for the House to pursue the Epstein files, given the Senate’s procedural hurdles.
For now, the administration’s reluctance to release the documents continues to fuel speculation and distrust, ensuring that the Epstein saga remains a persistent challenge for Trump’s presidency.
Also Read: MAGA Now Scrutinize Trump Over Epstein Client List Failure
Visit the Homepage for our extensive library of news, or read news for you below.