Gavin Newsom Now Counters Texas Republicans With Redistricting Plan

In a bold political maneuver, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed legislation on Thursday, August 21, 2025, to place a redistricting proposal before voters in a special election on November 4.

The plan, designed to redraw congressional districts in favor of Democrats, aims to flip five Republican-held seats and strengthen four competitive ones.

This move comes as a direct response to Texas Republicans’ mid-decade redistricting efforts, urged by President Donald Trump, which could add five GOP seats in the Lone Star State.

The legislation, passed swiftly by California’s Democratic-controlled Legislature, temporarily suspends the state’s independent redistricting commission—established by voters in 2008 and 2010 to curb partisan gerrymandering—and empowers lawmakers to draw maps for the 2026, 2028, and 2030 elections.

Authority would revert to the commission afterward.

Newsom framed the action as a necessary “neutralization” of Texas’s gerrymander, stating, “We’re responding to what occurred in Texas.

We’re neutralizing what occurred, and we’re giving the American people a fair chance.”

This mid-decade redistricting is unprecedented in recent U.S. history, typically occurring only after the decennial census to account for population shifts.

Trump’s call for Texas to redraw maps has ignited a partisan arms race, with California leading the Democratic counteroffensive.

Democrats view control of the U.S. House as essential to checking Trump’s agenda in the latter half of his term, while Republicans see it as vital for advancing policies and staving off investigations.

The Texas Trigger and California’s Response

Texas Republicans advanced their redistricting plan amid Democratic opposition, with the Texas House approving maps on August 20 that could secure five additional GOP seats.

The state Senate was expected to vote as early as August 22, potentially finalizing the changes.

Trump has publicly pushed for these adjustments, citing alleged Democratic gerrymandering in states like Massachusetts and Illinois post-2020 census—claims disputed by fact-checkers who note those states’ maps were drawn under standard protocols.

In California, the proposal includes controversial district mergers, such as combining conservative Shasta County with liberal Marin County, tilting the balance toward Democrats.

Currently, California sends 43 Democrats and 9 Republicans to Congress out of 52 seats—a disparity Republicans argue already favors Democrats disproportionately to voter registration (about 38% Republican statewide).

Critics, including Assembly Republican Leader James Gallagher, decry the plan as a power grab: “It’s about power on both sides, rigging congressional districts to get partisan results.

That’s what a gerrymander is.”

Gallagher also broke with Trump, calling mid-decade redistricting a mistake that could “burn it all down.”

Newsom’s administration has ramped up a social media campaign targeting Trump and Texas Republicans, with dozens of posts highlighting the issue.

The governor referenced Trump’s actions in California, including deploying the National Guard to Los Angeles over protests and reversing environmental laws, as evidence of overreach motivating the response.

Voter Sentiment and Endorsements

A recent Los Angeles Times/Berkeley poll indicates strong support among California voters for the redistricting plan, with approval ratings around 75% for Newsom’s handling of the issue—far higher than his overall 38% approval rating.

However, voters have historically favored the independent commission, showing reluctance to abandon it permanently.

The measure, dubbed Proposition 50, has garnered high-profile endorsements, including from former President Barack Obama, who called it “a smart, measured approach” to a “particular problem” despite his general opposition to gerrymandering.

On the opposition side, former Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger and philanthropist Charles Munger Jr., key architects of the independent commission, vow to campaign against it.

Republicans, lacking legislative votes to block it, plan legal challenges and a well-funded ballot opposition.

Nationally, a Politico/Morning Consult poll shows Democrats overwhelmingly back California’s efforts despite anti-gerrymandering rhetoric, viewing it as a defensive necessity.

Progressive voices, like former Ohio State Senator Nina Turner, argue the fight must extend beyond maps to street protests, while conservatives on X accuse Newsom of hypocrisy and majoritarianism.

Potential Impacts

If approved, the maps could shift House control in 2026, with experts estimating a net zero change if both states’ plans succeed—maintaining the status quo but deepening polarization.

Mid-decade redistricting could spread to other states, with New York Governor Kathy Hochul and others signaling similar moves.

The special election could cost taxpayers up to $200 million, based on past precedents.

Legal battles loom: California’s Supreme Court already rejected a GOP bid to halt the process, but further suits are expected.

This showdown between ideological rivals underscores America’s deepening divide, where redistricting—once a decennial adjustment—has become a tool for midterm dominance.

As Newsom positions himself nationally, the outcome could reshape Congress and test voters’ tolerance for partisan mapping.

Also Read: MAGA Now Scrutinize Trump Over Epstein Client List Failure

Visit the Homepage for our extensive library of news, or read news for you below.

Join us on Facebook and X.

About The Author

Randros

Journalist & Writer. Crypto Market & U.S. Economy news segments.
A verified FrankNez journalist ✔️

See author's posts