India’s securities regulator, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (SEBI), has launched an investigation into index derivatives trades conducted by Jane Street Group, a prominent high-frequency trading (HFT) firm.
This probe, reported by Bloomberg on May 16, 2025, underscores growing regulatory scrutiny in India’s derivatives market, where HFT firms have reaped substantial profits while retail investors often face significant losses.
SEBI’s Investigation into Jane Street
According to sources familiar with the matter, SEBI is examining Jane Street’s trading activities in India’s index derivatives market, particularly focusing on potential irregularities.
This follows a recent closure of a separate investigation by India’s National Stock Exchange (NSE) into Jane Street’s trades, which found no conclusive evidence of wrongdoing.
However, SEBI’s renewed probe signals persistent concerns about the role of HFT firms in a market that has seen explosive growth in derivatives trading, driven largely by retail participation.
India’s derivatives market, one of the largest globally by volume, has become a lucrative playground for HFT firms.
These firms leverage advanced algorithms, ultra-fast computing systems, and co-location services at exchanges to execute trades in milliseconds, often outpacing retail and institutional investors.
While Jane Street has emerged as a dominant player, the broader implications of HFT practices raise questions about market fairness and transparency.
What Is High-Frequency Trading?
High-frequency trading involves the use of sophisticated algorithms to execute a large number of trades at extremely high speeds, often within fractions of a second.
HFT firms like Jane Street, Citadel, and Virtu rely on the following strategies:
- Market Making: Providing liquidity by continuously quoting buy and sell prices, profiting from the bid-ask spread.
- Arbitrage: Exploiting price discrepancies across markets or instruments.
- Momentum Trading: Capitalizing on short-term price movements triggered by market events or order flows.
- Order Anticipation: Predicting and front-running large institutional or retail orders based on market data.
These strategies are powered by cutting-edge technology, including low-latency networks, machine learning models, and proximity to exchange servers.
While HFT firms argue they enhance market liquidity and efficiency, critics contend that their practices create an uneven playing field, particularly for retail investors.
How High-Frequency Trading Hurts Retail Investors
Retail investors, who typically lack the resources and technological sophistication of HFT firms, face several disadvantages in markets dominated by high-frequency trading.
Below, are some of the specific ways in which firms like Jane Street, Citadel, and Virtu negatively affect retail participants.
1. Front-Running and Order Flow Exploitation
HFT firms use their speed advantage to detect and act on retail orders before they are fully executed, a practice often likened to front-running.
By analyzing order flow data—sometimes purchased from brokers or exchanges—HFT algorithms can anticipate retail trades and position themselves to profit.
For example, if a retail investor places a large buy order for an index option, an HFT firm may quickly buy the same option and sell it back at a higher price, increasing costs for the retail trader.
This dynamic is particularly pronounced in India’s options market, where retail investors have flocked to trade index derivatives like Nifty and Bank Nifty options.
A 2024 post on X by user @itsTarH highlighted how HFT firms like Jane Street profit “billions” from retail option traders.
2. Increased Market Volatility
HFT strategies, such as momentum trading, can amplify short-term price swings, creating volatility that disadvantages retail investors.
For instance, when HFT algorithms detect a surge in retail buying or selling, they may exacerbate the trend by piling into the same direction, only to reverse positions rapidly, leaving retail investors caught in whipsaw price movements.
In India’s derivatives market, where retail participation has skyrocketed, this volatility is a significant concern.
SEBI data indicates that retail investors accounted for over 35% of equity derivatives turnover in 2024, yet many suffer losses due to unpredictable price swings driven by HFT activity.
The Bloomberg report notes that retail investors are “nursing losses” in a market where HFT firms have generated “big gains.”
3. Higher Trading Costs
HFT firms profit from capturing the bid-ask spread, which can widen during periods of high volatility or low liquidity.
Retail investors, who typically execute smaller trades, end up paying these inflated spreads, increasing their transaction costs.
Additionally, HFT-driven price movements can lead to slippage, where retail orders are filled at less favorable prices than anticipated.
For example, a retail investor trading Nifty options may place a market order only to find that the price has moved against them by the time the trade is executed, thanks to HFT algorithms reacting to the order flow.
Over time, these costs erode retail investors’ returns, particularly for those engaging in frequent trading.
4. Information Asymmetry
HFT firms invest heavily in proprietary data feeds and co-location services, giving them access to market information milliseconds before retail investors.
This information asymmetry allows HFT firms to make informed trading decisions while retail investors rely on delayed or less granular data.
In India, where exchanges offer premium data services to high-paying clients, HFT firms like Jane Street have a clear edge over retail participants.
This disparity undermines the principle of a level playing field, as retail investors are effectively competing against firms with superior information and execution capabilities.
The SEBI investigation into Jane Street may shed light on whether such advantages were used to exploit market inefficiencies at the expense of retail traders.
5. Loss of Confidence in Markets
The perception that HFT firms rig the game erodes retail investors’ trust in financial markets.
When retail traders consistently lose money due to HFT-driven disadvantages, they may withdraw from the market altogether, reducing overall participation and liquidity.
In India, where financial inclusion is a priority, this loss of confidence could hinder efforts to encourage retail investment in securities and derivatives.
A 2024 SEBI study revealed that over 90% of retail investors in India’s derivatives market incurred losses, with an average loss of ₹1.2 lakh per investor.
While not all losses can be attributed to HFT, the dominance of firms like Jane Street, Citadel, and Virtu in these markets exacerbates the challenges faced by retail participants.
Case Studies: Jane Street, Citadel, and Virtu
Jane Street
Jane Street, a New York-based proprietary trading firm, is one of the largest players in global derivatives markets, including India’s.
Its use of quantitative models and high-speed trading has made it a formidable force in index options trading.
The ongoing SEBI probe into Jane Street’s activities highlights concerns about whether its strategies comply with Indian regulations, particularly those aimed at protecting retail investors.
Citadel
Citadel, another HFT giant, operates extensively in global equity and derivatives markets.
In India, Citadel has been active in both cash and derivatives segments, leveraging its technological prowess to dominate order flows.
Retail investors often find themselves outmaneuvered by Citadel’s algorithms, which can detect and exploit retail trading patterns with precision.
Virtu Financial
Virtu Financial, known for its market-making activities, operates in India’s derivatives market through high-speed trading strategies.
Like Jane Street and Citadel, Virtu profits from capturing spreads and arbitraging price differences, often at the expense of retail investors who lack the tools to compete.
Also Read: Expert Predicts Massive Panic Will Trigger Short Squeeze Across the Market
Regulatory Responses and the Path Forward
SEBI’s investigation into Jane Street is part of a broader push to regulate HFT and protect retail investors.
Recent measures include:
- Tighter Disclosure Norms: Requiring HFT firms to disclose their trading strategies and order execution methods.
- Limits on Co-Location: Restricting access to exchange servers to reduce the speed advantage of HFT firms.
- Enhanced Surveillance: Deploying advanced monitoring systems to detect manipulative trading practices.
- Investor Education: Launching campaigns to educate retail investors about the risks of derivatives trading.
Globally, regulators are also taking action.
In the U.S., the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has proposed rules to curb payment for order flow, a practice that benefits HFT firms by giving them access to retail trades.
However, retail investors have criticized the SEC for its ‘lip service’.
In Europe, the Markets in Financial Instruments Directive (MiFID II) imposes strict requirements on HFT firms to ensure market fairness.
To level the playing field, SEBI could consider additional reforms, such as:
- Minimum Resting Periods: Requiring orders to remain in the market for a minimum time to reduce HFT’s speed advantage.
- Retail-Only Trading Windows: Creating exclusive trading sessions for retail investors to mitigate HFT interference.
- Caps on Derivatives Leverage: Limiting the leverage available to retail investors to reduce speculative losses.
Also Read: SEC Now Responds to Retail Investors on Illegal Manipulation
Why This Matters
The SEBI investigation into Jane Street’s index derivatives trades is a critical step toward addressing the challenges posed by high-frequency trading in India’s financial markets.
While HFT firms like Jane Street, Citadel, and Virtu contribute to market liquidity, their practices often come at the expense of retail investors, who face front-running, increased volatility, higher costs, and information asymmetry.
By implementing robust regulatory measures and promoting investor education, SEBI can foster a fairer and more inclusive market environment.
Retail investors must remain vigilant, understanding the risks of derivatives trading and seeking professional advice when possible.
As India’s financial markets continue to evolve, striking a balance between innovation and investor protection will be key to ensuring sustainable growth and confidence in the system.
But I’m curious to know what you think — leave your thoughts below or start a discussion in the Retail Investor Forum.
Back to Retail Investor News.
Follow Frank Nez on X and Facebook for more community insights.
Also Read: Hedge Fund Now Freezes Ability For Customers To Withdraw Money
Empowering Retail Investors
Treat Frank Nez to a coffee
Buy Frank Nez a coffee here ☕
Or support the blog monthly here ❤️
About The Author
