NYC Mayor Supports Lawsuit to End ICE Arrests at Courthouses

In a bold move highlighting growing tensions between local and federal authorities on immigration enforcement, Mayor Eric Adams has publicly endorsed a lawsuit aimed at halting U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) arrests at immigration courthouses.

The suit, filed by city officials, demands an immediate cessation of what critics describe as predatory tactics that deter immigrants from attending mandatory hearings.

Adams’ backing comes as data reveals a stark disparity: over the past few months, approximately half of all ICE courthouse arrests nationwide have occurred in New York City, primarily at locations like 26 Federal Plaza, a hub for immigration proceedings.

“No one should be afraid to send their children to school, go to a hospital when sick, call 911 when in danger, or go to a court hearing when called upon to do so,” Adams stated, emphasizing the need for unrestricted access to essential services and justice.

This development unfolds against a backdrop of escalating conflicts between the Trump administration and sanctuary cities like New York.

Just last month, on July 24, the Justice Department filed a lawsuit against Mayor Adams and New York City, accusing them of obstructing federal immigration enforcement through sanctuary policies.

The federal suit claims these local measures thwart efforts to deport individuals deemed “criminal illegal aliens,” further straining relations.

The Department of Homeland Security (DHS) swiftly pushed back against the city’s lawsuit, framing courthouse arrests as a practical and secure method of enforcement.

In a statement to media outlets, Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin asserted, “Nothing in the constitution prohibits arresting a lawbreaker where you find them.

The ability of law enforcement to make arrests of criminal illegal aliens in courthouses is common sense.

It conserves valuable law enforcement resources because they already know where a target will be.

It is also safer for our officers and the community.

These illegal aliens have gone through security and been screened to not have any weapons.”

DHS officials, including Kenneth Genalo, director of ICE’s New York City field office, have echoed this sentiment in recent interviews.

Speaking on December 17, 2024, Genalo highlighted the operational advantages of targeting known locations.

Advocates Highlight Human Toll and Systemic Undermining

Immigration advocates argue that these arrests not only instill fear but also erode the integrity of the judicial process.

Benjamin Remy, senior staff attorney for the New York Legal Assistance Group’s (NYLAG) Immigrant Protection Unit, described the harrowing scenes at courthouses: “People are showing up with their hearing notice.

They’re going to the court room that they’ve been told to go to.

They’re coming with the documents for their case or whatever the judge has required of them.

And they look outside that waiting room and they see ICE officers oftentimes detaining people while other people are waiting for their court hearing.”

Remy further explained the impossible dilemma faced by immigrants: “What we’re seeing is that people are being forced to choose between gambling by continuing with their case and risk being detained indefinitely, or to be ordered to remove without even having a chance to present their case.

And that just places people in an impossible situation.”

He added, “They don’t know if they’re going home to their family.

They don’t know if they’re going home to their kids.

They’re essentially taking a gamble, and that gamble is to try and do things the right way.”

This fear has ripple effects, with some immigrants avoiding court altogether, leading to default deportation orders.

In neighborhoods like Little Haiti, deportation anxieties have gripped communities, amplifying calls for reform.

Community Efforts to Counter Fear

In response to these detentions, grassroots initiatives have emerged to provide support.

Sonia Wiecek, a dedicated court watcher who frequents hearings at 26 Federal Plaza, explained her group’s mission: “Our primary role as court watchers is to be there to help collect contact information for any emergency contacts should they be detained by ICE.

I think it’s a level of assurance to them — a very small level of assurance — that people are out here and they’re looking out for them.”

Such volunteer efforts underscore a broader resistance movement.

Recent reports detail activist groups across regions, including Orange County, organizing to slow down ICE raids and deportations through legal aid, monitoring, and community alerts.

In June, New York City Comptroller and mayoral candidate Brad Lander was briefly detained during a protest at an immigration court, highlighting the intensity of local opposition.

Adams’ support for the lawsuit marks a notable rift with the Trump administration, which has ramped up immigration enforcement since taking office.

The federal suit against New York City in July follows earlier actions, including threats to withhold funding from sanctuary jurisdictions.

Additionally, the Justice Department has navigated complex cases involving alleged criminal migrants, sometimes adjusting prosecutions amid political pressures.

Social media buzz today reflects the story’s immediacy, with outlets like Scripps News and NBC 26 amplifying the news.

Public reactions on platforms like X emphasize divides, with some praising Adams for protecting vulnerable populations and others criticizing him for undermining law enforcement.

As the lawsuit progresses, it could set precedents for how federal agencies operate in state and local courts, potentially influencing immigration policy nationwide.

Also Read: MAGA Now Scrutinize Trump Over Epstein Client List Failure

For customer support or to report typos and corrections, contact media@franknez.com.