
August 4, 2025 — A recently leaked Department of Homeland Security (DHS) memorandum has sparked intense debate over the Trump administration’s immigration policies, revealing discussions about leveraging U.S. military resources to support mass deportation efforts.
Authored by Phil Hegseth, a DHS senior adviser and brother of Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, the memo outlines strategies to enhance coordination between DHS and the Department of Defense (DoD) for what it describes as “homeland defense.”
The memo, obtained by The New Republic and published on August 2, 2025, details a June 21, 2025, meeting between senior DHS and DoD officials, including Pete Hegseth, acting ICE Commissioner Todd Lyons, Joint Chiefs Chairman Dan Caine, and NORTHCOM Commander Gregory Guillot.
It emphasizes the need for the U.S. military to prioritize “homeland defense” by assisting in immigration enforcement, specifically Trump’s mass deportation agenda.
The document outlines three action items, including leveraging the Pentagon’s “nationwide operational planning capabilities” to address illegal immigration, which it compares to threats from “Al Qaeda or ISIS cells” operating within the U.S.
The memo acknowledges the deployment of 5,000 National Guard members and 700 U.S. Marines to Los Angeles in June 2025 to quell protests against ICE raids, admitting the operation was “not perfect.”
It suggests similar military deployments could be needed “for years to come” to manage expected unrest, such as “LA-style riots,” tied to immigration enforcement. Phil Hegseth, who serves as a DHS liaison to the Pentagon, urged military leaders to recognize the “urgency” of this mission, framing it as a critical political priority for the Trump administration.
Further Context of Military Involvement

The Trump administration has already employed military personnel in domestic immigration operations.
In June 2025, President Trump nationalized National Guard units and deployed them alongside Marines to Los Angeles to counter anti-ICE protests, which the administration labeled a “violent insurrectionist mob.”
The memo’s reference to this operation as imperfect highlights logistical challenges, including reports of troops lacking adequate food, water, or clear objectives.
Phil Hegseth’s role has drawn scrutiny due to his limited prior experience in national security, having previously worked as a podcast producer and social media manager for a conservative think tank.
His appointment as a senior DHS adviser and Pentagon liaison, alongside his proximity to his brother, has raised questions about nepotism, though anti-nepotism rules are not directly applicable as he is a DHS employee.
The memo has alarmed legal and policy experts.
Joseph Nunn of the Brennan Center for Justice described it as “disturbing,” warning that it signals a potential normalization of military involvement in civilian law enforcement, a practice historically limited in the U.S. due to laws like the Posse Comitatus Act.
Carrie Lee of the German Marshall Fund called the proposal unprecedented, comparing it to military use during Japanese internment in the 1940s, and argued it undermines the rule of law.
Public discourse on X reflects divided sentiments. Some users, such as @StampTheVote, expressed alarm over the memo’s implications, citing it as evidence of authoritarian overreach.
Others, aligned with Trump’s base, supported the use of military resources to address immigration, framing it as a national security necessity.
These discussions, while inconclusive, highlight the polarized reactions to the administration’s policies.
This memo aligns with Trump’s aggressive immigration stance, which includes maximizing military assets for border security and deportations.
The administration has already deployed military aircraft for deportation operations and increased border fortifications.
The memo’s call for sustained military involvement suggests a long-term strategy, raising concerns about civil liberties and the militarization of domestic policy.
Critics argue the comparison of immigration to terrorist threats like Al Qaeda or ISIS inflates the issue, potentially justifying excessive force.
The administration’s defenders, however, point to rising border crossings and gang activity as necessitating robust measures.
The White House and DHS have not publicly commented on the leak, consistent with their stance on sensitive operational matters.
However, the leaked DHS memo authored by Phil Hegseth reveals a strategic push to integrate U.S. military resources into domestic immigration enforcement, marking a significant escalation in the Trump administration’s approach.
While framed as a response to national security concerns, the plan has sparked fears of overreach and eroded civilian protections.
As debates intensify, the memo underscores the challenges of balancing security, legality, and public trust in a polarized political climate.
Also Read: Trump is Now Being Accused of Getting Epstein Killed
Visit the Homepage for our extensive library of news, or read news for you below.