In a fiery closed-door meeting on Capitol Hill on May 20, 2025, President Donald Trump issued a stark warning to House Republicans: “Don’t fuck around with Medicaid.”
The blunt directive, reported by multiple GOP lawmakers and sources close to the president, underscores a growing rift within the Republican Party as it struggles to unify behind Trump’s ambitious “big, beautiful bill.”
This sweeping legislation, which aims to extend $4.5 trillion in tax cuts while slashing $1.5 trillion in federal spending, has ignited a contentious debate over proposed Medicaid cuts, with significant political and moral implications at stake.
The Heart of the Conflict: Medicaid Cuts and GOP Divisions
Medicaid, the federal-state health insurance program serving nearly 80 million low-income, elderly, and disabled Americans, has become the centerpiece of the GOP’s internal struggle.
House Republicans, led by Speaker Mike Johnson, are pushing to finalize the bill by Memorial Day, relying on a budget reconciliation process to bypass Senate filibusters and fast-track the legislation with a simple majority.
The bill’s cost-saving measures include at least $880 billion in cuts, primarily targeting Medicaid, to offset the massive tax breaks championed by Trump during his campaign.
However, the proposed cuts have sparked fierce opposition from both moderate and conservative factions within the GOP.
Moderate Republicans, particularly those in swing districts, are wary of the political fallout from slashing a program that millions of their constituents rely on.
Representatives like Jeff Van Drew of New Jersey, Don Bacon of Nebraska, and Gabe Evans of Colorado have publicly resisted deep Medicaid reductions, citing the impact on vulnerable populations such as pregnant women, children, and seniors.
Van Drew, for instance, emphasized Trump’s personal assurances, stating, “He does not want to hurt Medicaid,” and noted multiple one-on-one conversations where the president reiterated his opposition to cuts.
On the other hand, conservative hardliners, including members of the House Freedom Caucus like Rep. Chip Roy of Texas and Rep.
Andy Harris of Maryland, are pushing for even steeper reductions.
They argue that rolling back the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA) Medicaid expansion, which covers 20 million low-income adults, is essential to curb federal spending and balance the budget.
Roy has been vocal, criticizing colleagues for shying away from Medicaid reform, stating, “Why can’t we? Medicaid was expanded under Obamacare, which we all opposed.”
Trump’s Mixed Messages on Medicaid
Trump’s public stance on Medicaid has been inconsistent, adding to the GOP’s challenges.
Throughout his campaign and early second term, he repeatedly vowed to protect Medicaid, Medicare, and Social Security, promising no cuts to these programs.
In a February 2025 interview with Fox News, Trump declared, “None of that stuff is going to be touched,” and reiterated this commitment on multiple occasions, including a May 4 appearance on Meet the Press, where he said he would veto any bill that cuts Medicaid.
However, his endorsement of the GOP’s budget plan, which includes significant Medicaid reductions, has drawn accusations of betrayal from Democrats and some Republicans.
To reconcile his promises with the bill’s provisions, Trump has emphasized targeting “waste, fraud, and abuse” in Medicaid, such as removing undocumented immigrants from the program and imposing work requirements for able-bodied adults.
He has argued that these measures do not constitute cuts but rather ensure the program’s integrity for its intended beneficiaries.
White House spokesperson Kush Desai reinforced this narrative, stating, “President Trump and Republicans are protecting and preserving Medicaid for the Americans who the program was intended to be a lifeline for: pregnant women, children, disabled individuals, and seniors.”
Critics, however, argue that these measures will still result in millions losing coverage.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that the proposed changes, including work requirements, more frequent eligibility checks, and reduced federal funding to states, could lead to 8.6 million Americans losing health insurance over the next decade.
Democrats, such as House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, have accused Republicans of “ripping away health care” to fund tax breaks for wealthy donors, while health advocacy groups warn that work requirements add bureaucratic hurdles without significantly boosting employment.
Sen. Josh Hawley’s Moral and Political Warning
Adding to the GOP’s internal strife, Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri penned a scathing op-ed in The New York Times on May 12, 2025, titled “Don’t Cut Medicaid,” calling the proposed cuts “morally wrong and politically suicidal.”
Hawley, a vocal Trump ally, argued that slashing Medicaid violates the president’s campaign promises and threatens the livelihoods of working-class Americans who supported the GOP.
He highlighted Missouri’s 2020 vote to expand Medicaid and enshrine it in the state constitution, noting that over a million Missourians could lose coverage if the cuts proceed.
“If Congress cuts funding for Medicaid benefits, Missouri workers and their children will lose their health care, and hospitals will close,” Hawley wrote.
Hawley’s stance reflects broader concerns among Senate Republicans, particularly those from rural states like Kansas, where Sen. Jerry Moran has warned that Medicaid cuts could devastate struggling rural hospitals.
The Senate’s more moderate approach, proposing only $4 billion in cuts compared to the House’s $880 billion, sets the stage for a potential intra-party clash as the bill moves forward.
Policy Details: What’s in the Medicaid Cuts?
The House GOP’s plan, unveiled on May 11, 2025, includes several measures to achieve the $880 billion in savings, primarily targeting Medicaid:
- Work Requirements: The bill introduces “community engagement requirements” mandating at least 80 hours per month of work, education, or service for able-bodied adults without dependents. Critics, including health policy experts, argue this adds administrative burdens and could disenroll thousands without increasing employment. A 2023 CBO report estimated that work requirements could save $109 billion over a decade but result in 600,000 people losing coverage.
- Frequent Eligibility Checks: The proposal shifts Medicaid enrollment from an annual to a semi-annual process, requiring beneficiaries to verify eligibility every six months. This change, coupled with stricter income verification for ACA coverage, is likely to increase “churn” in the program, making it harder for people to maintain coverage.
- Reduced Federal Funding: The bill cuts the federal matching rate for states that expanded Medicaid under the ACA from 90% to the traditional rate (averaging 60%), forcing states to cover more costs or reduce benefits. It also freezes provider taxes, which states use to finance their Medicaid programs, potentially creating budget gaps.
- Restrictions on Undocumented Immigrants: The legislation penalizes states like New York and California that offer Medicaid to undocumented immigrants by reducing their federal funding by 10%. It also requires proof of lawful presence for ACA coverage enrollment.
- Cost-Sharing and Asset Limits: Medicaid recipients earning above 100% of the federal poverty level (about $32,000 for a family of four) would face out-of-pocket costs for some services. Additionally, applicants with homes valued over $1 million would be ineligible, a measure aimed at tightening eligibility.
These changes, while framed by Republicans as reforms to curb inefficiencies, are projected to reduce coverage significantly.
The CBO’s estimate of 8.6 million uninsured Americans could rise to 13 million by 2034 if paired with the expiration of ACA premium tax credits, according to health advocacy groups.
Political and Economic Implications
The Medicaid debate is not just a policy issue but a political minefield.
With 80% of Americans opposing significant Medicaid cuts, according to Hawley’s op-ed, the GOP risks alienating its base, particularly lower-income MAGA supporters who rely on the program.
Posts on X reflect this sentiment, with users like @cwebbonline accusing Trump of betraying his promise by backing a plan that “slashes $880 billion from Medicaid” to fund tax cuts for the wealthy.
Moderate Republicans in competitive districts, such as Rep. Mariannette Miller-Meeks of Iowa, who won her seat by just 799 votes, face intense pressure.
Her district, with 132,148 Medicaid recipients, has seen protests over the proposed cuts, highlighting the electoral risks for GOP lawmakers.
Democrats are capitalizing on this, with strategists like Jesse Ferguson comparing the vote to “intentionally hitting the iceberg” on the Titanic.
Economically, the cuts could have far-reaching consequences.
Medicaid supports over 70 million Americans and funds critical services like rural hospitals, which could close without adequate funding.
The ripple effects could exacerbate healthcare access issues, increase premiums, and strain state budgets, particularly in states that expanded Medicaid under the ACA.
Trump’s Push for Unity and the Path Forward
Trump’s Capitol Hill visit on May 20 was a calculated move to rally GOP lawmakers behind the bill.
He urged unity, warning holdouts like Rep. Thomas Massie of Kentucky, a vocal opponent, that they could face primary challenges.
Trump also addressed the State and Local Tax (SALT) deduction, telling blue-state Republicans to accept a modest increase in the $10,000 cap rather than pushing for more.
Despite his efforts, the bill’s fate remains uncertain.
House Speaker Mike Johnson is racing against a self-imposed Memorial Day deadline, with floor votes expected as early as May 21 or 22.
The Energy and Commerce Committee, tasked with finding $880 billion in savings, has resisted some of the most drastic cuts, such as per-capita caps, but the $715 billion in health-related savings still draws ire from moderates and advocates.
In the Senate, resistance from figures like Hawley and Moran could complicate passage, especially given the chamber’s more modest $4 billion cut proposal.
The reconciliation process requires GOP unity, as Democrats are expected to uniformly oppose the bill, framing it as a giveaway to the wealthy at the expense of the poor.
A High-Stakes Gamble
Trump’s warning to House Republicans encapsulates the high-stakes balancing act facing the GOP.
The “big, beautiful bill” represents a bold attempt to deliver on tax cuts and other campaign promises, but the Medicaid cuts threaten to fracture party unity and alienate voters.
As Sen. Hawley warned, the move could be “politically suicidal,” especially in states where Medicaid is a lifeline for working-class families.
With the House vote looming and Senate negotiations on the horizon, the GOP must navigate a delicate path to reconcile Trump’s rhetoric with the bill’s reality.
The outcome will not only shape healthcare policy but also define the Republican Party’s identity as it seeks to maintain its working-class base while appeasing its conservative fiscal hawks.
For now, Trump’s directive to “not fuck around with Medicaid” looms large, but whether it will unify or further divide his party remains to be seen.
Back to Daily Market News.
About The Author
