Tag: World News (Page 1 of 3)

Credit Suisse Receives New $17 Billion in Write-offs

Market News Daily: Credit Suisse receives news $17 Billion in write-offs.
Market News Daily: Credit Suisse receives news $17 Billion in write-offs.

(Reuters) Credit Suisse said 16 billion Swiss francs ($17.24 billion) of its Additional Tier 1 debt will be written down to zero on the orders of the Swiss regulator as part of its rescue merger with UBS, angering bondholders.

FINMA, the Swiss regulator, said the decision would bolster the bank’s capital.

The central bank also helped by providing 100 billion Swiss francs ($108 billion) in liquidity assistance.

The move reflects authorities’ desire to see private investors share the pain from Credit Suisse’s troubles.

Chair Marlene Amstad said FINMA had stuck to the country’s “too-big-to-fail” banking framework in making the decision.

It means bondholders appear to be left with nothing while shareholders, who sit below bonds in the priority ladder for repayment in a bankruptcy process, will receive $3.23 billion under the UBS deal.

“It’s stunning and hard to understand how they can reverse the hierarchy between AT1 holders and shareholders,” said Jerome Legras, head of research at Axiom Alternative Investments, an investor in Credit Suisse’s AT1 debt.

Reuters reported earlier on Sunday that Swiss authorities were considering imposing losses on bondholders as part of the rescue deal.

UBS’ CEO Ralph Hamers told analysts that the decision to write down the AT1 bonds to zero was taken by FINMA, so it would not create a liability for the bank.

How Did Credit Suisse Collapse?

Market News Daily: Credit Suisse receives news $17 Billion in write-offs.
Market News Daily: Credit Suisse receives news $17 Billion in write-offs.

Credit Suisse (NYSE:CS) has gone through financial difficulties many times since its inception but has been bailed throughout its history.

“A string of scandals over many years, top management changes, multi-billion dollar losses and an uninspiring strategy can be blamed for the mess that the 167-year-old Swiss lender now finds itself in”, says Reuters.

Chairman Axel Lehmann is blaming the banks collapse on retail investors.

In an interview in Switzerland, the Chairman says “last autumn we had a social media storm” and highlights the changing environment in the market.

“Last autumn we had a social media storm and this had huge repercussions, more in the retail sector than in the wholesale sector, and too much becomes too much.

And that’s when we reached this point, it’s an accumulation of various facts that contributed to one another then materialized at some point. And this then caused the situation.”

Axel Lehmann also said they were affected by a model that “no longer works in this market environment.”

Should There Be a Limit to How Many Times a Bank Can Get Bailed Out?

The fed said in 2021 that ‘meme stocks’ pose risks to financial stability, something retail investors voiced as the most absurd thing our body of government could conclude.

Overleveraged hedge funds, infinite capital from banks, and complicit regulators have been the main cause of systemic risk.

We’re beginning to see the retail crowd become a scapegoat for our financial system’s failures — though this isn’t going to last long.

The ‘it’s retail’s fault’ card won’t carry weight in lawful request for accountability.

This card was used during the ‘meme stock’ frenzy as well when Robinhood, Citadel, and other brokerages halted trading.

Retail investors were blamed but the truth is there was a massive liquidity problem and short sellers could not afford to close their naked shorts.

The only solution was to halt trading, take short positions again, and wait for prices to fall in order to make up losses.

Regulators waived billions in collateral, bailing institutions out of a massive mess.

More and more investors are losing trust in the financial system.

Now that Credit Suisse has escaped with $17 billion in write-off, it’s now more evident that certain institutions truly are too big to fail.

But I’d love to hear your thoughts on this – leave a comment down below.

Related: “The Game is Rigged” Says Ex-Citadel Data Scientist

Market News Published Daily

Market News Daily: Credit Suisse receives news $17 Billion in write-offs.
Market News Daily: Credit Suisse receives news $17 Billion in write-offs.

For stock market, business news and updates, join the newsletter to receive weekly market news and notifications straight to your inbox.

Franknez.com is the media site that keeps retail investors informed.

You can also follow Frank Nez on TwitterInstagramFacebook, or LinkedIn for daily posts.


Franknez.com

You can now read exclusive FrankNez articles for only $1/mo.

  • Gain access to EXCLUSIVE FrankNez articles you won’t find here.
  • Become part of a private and safe Discord community, just for retail investors.
  • Get drawn at the end of the year for holiday giveaways.

My New Book is Out Now! Use Code: THENEZ


Citadel High Frequency Trading: Fined by Korea’s Regulators

Citadel High Frequency Trading: Fined $9 Million by Korea's Financial Regulators
Market News: Citadel Securities is fined $9 million by South Korea’s financial regulators.

(Reuters) South Korea’s financial regulator has imposed a fine of 11.88 billion won ($9.66 million) on U.S.-based Citadel Securities, saying it disturbed the local stock market with high-frequency algorithm trading.

The Financial Services Commission (FSC) said in a statement released on Thursday the firm had distorted stock prices with artificial factors, such as orders on the condition of “immediate or cancel” and by filling gaps in bid prices.

The firm carried out such trading on an average of 1,422 stocks per day from Oct. 2017 to May 2018, totaling more than 500 billion won worth of trades, according to the statement.

The Commission said it was the first time it had imposed fines on such high-frequency trading on the South Korean stock market, which has a high proportion of retail investors and little competition among algorithmic traders.

It added the firm did not provide algorithm source codes in the consultation process.

The regulator declined to identify the brokerage in violation but Citadel Securities confirmed it had been awaiting a decision, although it had yet to hear directly from the Commission.

“Citadel Securities works diligently to follow all applicable laws, regulations, and rules in jurisdictions in which we trade,” it said in a statement. “We strongly believe our trading complied with both Korean laws and global norms. We disagree with the FSC’s decision relating to our trading activity more than five years ago and will be seeking to appeal the decision.”

Citadel Securities was surprised and concerned to see that the regulator’s findings include references to a number of hearings the firm itself was not invited to participate in and supposed expert evidence that was never shared with the company and that it never had an opportunity to respond to, a source familiar with the situation said.

Citadel High Frequency Trading

CNN: Citadel high frequency trading in action – live.

High frequency trading takes advantage of investors and of the market itself.

One of the biggest manipulations in the market conducted by high frequency trading is spoofing.

Spoofing is a disruptive algorithmic trading practice that involves placing bids to buy or offers to sell futures contracts and canceling the bids or offers prior to the deal’s execution.

In December, Northwest Biotherapeutics sued Citadel Securities for spoofing their company stock.

The company is accused Citadel Securities LLC, Susquehanna, Virtu, and other Wall Street firms of driving its stock price down through the use of various illicit trading activities.

But this isn’t Citadel Securities first rodeo.

The hedge fund is under intense scrutiny from retail investors who say the company has too much power, allowing it to take advantage of retail trades through its payment for order flow and other manipulative tactics.

In 2015, an account operated in China by the brokerage arm of US hedge fund Citadel was suspended.

It was the latest casualty of regulators’ hunt for market manipulators and short sellers at the time.

The China Securities Regulatory Commission said that the Shanghai and Shenzhen stock exchanges had suspended 24 accounts as part of a probe into high-frequency trading.

But Citadel has a long history of market manipulation.

This was only an earlier incident where Citadel and high frequency trading have been an issue in the past.

Market News Published Daily

Market News Today: Citadel Securities gets fined $9 million by Korea's financial regulators.
Market News Today: Citadel Securities gets fined $9 million by Korea’s financial regulators.

For more stock market, business news and updates, join the newsletter to receive weekly market news and notifications straight to your inbox.

Franknez.com is the media blog that keeps retail investors informed.

You can also follow me on TwitterInstagramFacebook, or LinkedIn for daily posts.


Franknez.com

You can now read exclusive FrankNez articles for only $1/mo.

  • Gain access to EXCLUSIVE FrankNez articles you won’t find here.
  • Become part of a private and safe Discord community, just for retail investors.
  • Get drawn at the end of the year for holiday giveaways.

‘Twitter Files’ Exposes Why Twitter Blocked Hunter Biden’s Laptop Story

Twitter Files Hunter Biden Laptop Story
Curated by Franknez.com | Twitter Files: Why Twitter blocked Hunter Biden’s Laptop Story.

The ‘Twitter Files’ segment on Twitter is exploding as Matt Taibbi walks us through on how and why Hunter Biden’s laptop story was suppressed on the social media giant’s platform.

In this article, I’m going to break down the key highlights of the ‘Twitter Files’ part 1.

Let’s get started!

You can follow me on Twitter for more market news and updates.

“Twitter Wasn’t Always Like This”

Elon Musk releases Twitter Files exposing suppression of Hunter Biden laptop story.
Elon Musk releases Twitter Files exposing suppression of Hunter Biden laptop story.

Matt Taibbi says that in the beginning, Twitter more than lived up to its statement, “the power to create and share ideas and information instantly, without barriers.”

But at some point, this statement was completely manipulated.

That is, when both Democrats and Republicans gained access to directly influence what was allowed on Twitter and what wasn’t.

At first, tools for controlling speech were designed to combat the likes of spam and grifters, or financial fraudsters.

Over time, Twitter staff began to take advantage of this leverage tool by accepting speech manipulation on the platform from outside sources.

And apparently, CEO Jack Dorsey had no idea this was occurring!

By 2020, requests from connected actors to delete tweets were routine.

Email exchanges would read: “More to review from the Biden team.”

The reply would come back: “Handled.”

Twitter Files: Provided by Matt Taibbi, article curated by Frank Nez.
Twitter Files: Provided by Matt Taibbi, article curated by Frank Nez.

According to Taibbi, celebrities and unknowns alike could be removed or held for review on the behalf of a political party.

A Major Imbalance Between Democrats and Republicans

While both Democrats and Republicans had access to these tools, the system wasn’t balanced.

Because Twitter was overwhelmingly staffed by people of democratic political orientation, there were more channels, more ways to complain, and more opportunities for Democrats to take advantage of than there was for the Republican party.

Twitter Political Contributors

In 2018, Democrats contributed $295,722 to Twitter while Republicans only contributed $11,100 for access to manipulate speech on the platform.

2020 showed a massive jump in contributions from the Democratic party, totaling to $909,431.

Twitter Files, provided by Matt Taibbi, article curated by Frank Nez.
Twitter Files, provided by Matt Taibbi, article curated by Frank Nez.

The Twitter files shows us that Democrats tampered with elections in 2020 by removing content on Twitter that interfered with their campaign.

One of the biggest coverups being Hunter Biden’s laptop story.

Let’s dive into it.

Why Hunter Biden’s Laptop Story Was Hidden

On October 14, 2020, the New York Post published ‘Biden Secret Emails‘, an exposed based on the contents of Hunter Biden’s abandoned laptop.

Twitter took extraordinary steps to suppress the story, removing links, and posting warnings that it may be “unsafe”, says Taibbi.

The transmissions to share via direct message were blocked, a tool that is reserved for extreme cases, such as child *ornography.

White House spokeswoman Kaleigh McEnany was locked out of her account for sharing the story on Twitter.

This also led public policy executive Caroline Strom to reach out to the Twitter team regarding the unusual circumstances.

Twitter’s response to Strom was that Hunter Biden’s laptop story had been removed for violation of the company’s “hacked materials” policy.

Twitter Files Emails
Provided by Matt Taibbi, article curated by Franknez.com.

According to Matt Taibbi, these decisions were made from those with the highest levels of authority in the company without the knowledge of from former CEO Jack Dorsey.

Head of legal, policy, and trust Vijaya Gadde played a key role.

“They just freelanced it,” is how a former employee characterized the decision.

A Violation of the 1st Amendment

Democratic congressman Ro Khanna reached out to Gadde in efforts to hop on a call and discuss the backlash on ‘re speech’.

“Khanna was the only Democratic official I could find in the files who expressed concern, says Taibbi.”

Vijaya Gadde emails provided by Matt Taibbi, article curated by FrankNez.

“Hope you’re well Vijaya! But this seems a violation of the 1st Amendment principles. If there is a hack or classified information or other information that could expose a serious war crime and the NYT was to publish it, I think the NYT should have that right.”

“A journalist should not be held accountable for the illegal actions of the source unless they actively aided the hack. So to restrict the distribution of that material, especially regarding a Presidential candidate, seems not in the keeping of the principles of NYT v Sulivan“, said Ro Khanna.

This has been part 1 to the ‘Twitter Files’ exposing why Twitter blocked Hunter Biden’s Laptop story and how Democrats were able to influence the election by suppressing a story that had the potential to sway public opinion.

If you enjoyed this breakdown please share it.

You can follow me on Twitter.


Gary Gensler, Ken Griffin: Involved in Audit Quality Scheme?

Center for Audit Quality (CAQ)
Market News: Center for Audit Quality (CAQ) conflicts of interest

Not only has Gary Gensler been complicit to ongoing manipulation in the market, but he seems to be part of a scheme that starts at the Center for Audit Quality (CAQ).

The conflict of interest is unreal when you have a big hedge fund owner and regulator in the same funding board, and a chief who either doesn’t get it or is part of this scheme.

Joe Ucuzoglu of the CAQ and Citadel’s Ken Griffin are part of the same funding organization, The Kennedy Center Corporate Fund Board.

The Corporate Fund Board is a nationwide partnership of distinguished business leaders (i.e., Ken Griffin) from prominent corporations (i.e., Citadel), helping mobilize corporate partners and secure critical funding.

Joe Ucuzoglu is the Chief Executive Officer at Deloitte US, leading the largest professional services organization in the United States.

According to the Center for Audit Quality (CAQ), Joe Ucuzoglu frequently speaks on a broad range of current issues facing the business community including the regulatory landscape.

You see the conflict of interest here?

What a mess.

franknez.com

Welcome to Franknez.com – if you haven’t joined the newsletter, be sure to do that below. I’m publishing market news and updates daily.

Let’s dive right into it.

Join the newsletter to become part of an activist group fighting for market transparency!

Receive weekly market news and articles like this to stay up to date.

What is The Center for Audit Quality (CAQ)?

CAQ Center for Audit Quality
Center for Audit Quality Scheme | Gary Gensler speaking at CAQ

The CAQ is dedicated to enhancing investor confidence and public trust in the global capital markets by fostering high-quality performance by public company auditors.

The CAQ also convenes and collaborates with other stakeholders to advance the discussion of critical issues requiring action and intervention, and advocates policies and standards that promote public company auditors’ objectivity, effectiveness, and responsiveness to dynamic market conditions.

In simple terms, the CAQ works for the big guys to discuss critical issues they are undergoing and solve the problem(s) to fit their required market conditions.

The problem here is it leaves the retail investor out and caters to financial investors instead.

Gary Gensler CAQ

SEC Chairman Gary Gensler is in charge of protecting retail investors but seems to be enamored by his title rather than the actual work it takes to tackle market injustices in a number of conflicts of interest.

CAQ CEO background

As CEO, Lindsay is responsible for carrying out the mission and vision of the CAQ’s Governing Board, which is comprised of CEOs from eight leading public company auditing firms, including Joe Ucuzoglu’s Delloitte US.

Julie Bell Lindsay served as a Managing Director and the Deputy Head of Global Regulatory Affairs at Citigroup, a bank who’s been fined several times for fraud in the past decade.

Julie joined Citi in February 2009 as General Counsel – Capital Markets and Corporate Reporting, where she was the lead lawyer responsible for Citi’s public disclosures and global capital markets activities.

Prior to Citi, Julie served as Counsel to Commissioner Cynthia Glassman at the US Securities and Exchange Commission, where she counseled the Commissioner on all matters relating to public company disclosure obligations, corporate governance standards, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board and Financial Accounting Standards Board, enforcement matters, and issues affecting registered foreign companies. 

The Center for Audit Quality sounds more so like a lobbyist group than anything else.

But I’m curious to hear your thoughts.

Leave a comment down below.

Shoutout to @EduardBrichuk for the puzzle pieces on the matter.

You Can Follow Me On: Twitter | Facebook | LinkedIn


Support your favorite blog for only $4/mo.

franknez.com

Your support helps maintain all the costs it takes to run a blog at this scale.

The mission of this platform is to spread the truth majority of corporate media isn’t willing to, by giving the people in our community a voice.

Your dedicated support keeps this platform going.

Thank you for being a reader.

– Frank Nez


« Older posts

© 2024 Franknez.com

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑