In a narrowly passed vote on July 1, 2025, the U.S. Senate approved a sweeping budget bill that includes a $930 billion reduction in federal Medicaid funding over the next decade, a move that has ignited fierce debate across the nation.
The legislation, part of President Donald Trump’s broader fiscal agenda, also imposes work requirements for Medicaid recipients and is projected to result in approximately 12 million Americans losing health insurance coverage.
The bill, which passed 51-50 with Vice President JD Vance casting the tie-breaking vote, now heads to the House, where it faces significant opposition from some Republican lawmakers.
The Senate’s decision to pass the budget bill marks a pivotal moment in the ongoing battle over healthcare policy in the United States.
The legislation, described by supporters as a necessary step to curb federal spending and promote fiscal responsibility, includes significant cuts to Medicaid, the federal-state program that provides health coverage to nearly 80 million low-income and disabled Americans.
According to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the $930 billion in Medicaid reductions will lead to an estimated 12 million people losing coverage by 2034, with additional cuts to programs like the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) and clean energy initiatives.
The bill also introduces stringent work requirements for able-bodied adult Medicaid recipients without dependents, mandating at least 80 hours per month of work, education, or community service.
Critics argue these requirements could deter eligible individuals from enrolling due to bureaucratic hurdles.
“Part of the problem is it’s a deterrent because people see a work requirement, and they don’t investigate further, and they’ll just not apply for Medicaid, even if they actually could qualify,” said Sharona Hoffman, a health law expert at Case Western Reserve University.
Impact on Vulnerable Populations
The Medicaid cuts are expected to have far-reaching consequences, particularly for low-income families, seniors, and individuals with disabilities.
Optional Medicaid services, such as physical therapy, hospice care, and home and community-based services (HCBS), are likely to face reductions in many states.
These services are critical for disabled individuals, enabling them to live independently rather than in nursing homes.
Allison Hoffman, a medical ethics and health law professor at the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School, noted that while these services are “optional” under Medicaid statutes, they are “anything but optional for people’s livelihoods.”
The cuts also threaten the stability of rural healthcare systems.
A Brown University analysis estimates that 579 nursing homes across the U.S. are at high risk of closure due to reduced Medicaid funding.
To mitigate some of these concerns, the Senate included a $50 billion fund to support rural hospitals starting in 2026, but critics, including Sen. Susan Collins (R-Maine), argue this amount is insufficient, with estimates suggesting a need closer to $100 billion.
Additionally, the bill prohibits Medicaid funding for Planned Parenthood for the next decade, affecting services like cancer screenings and birth control, which constitute a significant portion of the organization’s budget.
A January 2025 PerryUndem poll found that 73% of Americans oppose defunding Planned Parenthood for these non-abortion services, highlighting the unpopularity of this provision.
Political Fallout and Public Reaction
The Senate vote, which saw three Republicans—Susan Collins (R-Maine), Thom Tillis (R-N.C.), and Rand Paul (R-Ky.)—break ranks to oppose the bill, underscores the contentious nature of the legislation. Collins cited the “harmful impact” on Medicaid and rural healthcare providers as her primary reason for dissent, while Paul objected to the bill’s $5 trillion debt ceiling increase.
Democrats have seized on the Medicaid cuts as a political wedge issue, with Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) calling the reductions “deeper and more devastating” than those in the House’s version of the bill.
An AP-NORC poll released on June 30, 2025, revealed that only 18% of U.S. adults believe Medicaid has too much funding, with 53% of voters opposing the bill overall, according to a Quinnipiac poll.
Democrats are already leveraging these cuts in campaign messaging, particularly in swing districts, as they aim to retake the House in the 2026 midterms.
On social media platforms like X, public sentiment reflects outrage and concern.
Posts from users highlight the bill’s potential to harm vulnerable populations, with one user stating, “The Senate’s $930B in Medicaid cuts? Not fiscal responsibility—it’s a catastrophe for millions.”
Another emphasized the impact on elderly and disabled individuals, noting, “My 94-year-old grandma’s community may wake up with less care.”
The bill now faces a challenging path in the House, where it passed earlier in a narrow 215-214 vote.
Some House Republicans, particularly those in districts with high Medicaid enrollment, are wary of the Senate’s deeper cuts.
Rep. David Valadao (R-Calif.), who previously pledged to protect Medicaid, voted for the House bill despite 48.7% of his constituents relying on the program.
This contradiction has drawn scrutiny, with Democrats planning to highlight such votes in future campaigns.
The Senate’s version also includes other contentious provisions, such as $46.5 billion for border wall construction and the elimination of a $7,500 electric vehicle tax credit.
These measures, combined with the Medicaid cuts, are part of a broader strategy to offset $4.5 trillion in tax cuts, primarily benefiting corporations and high-income earners.
However, the nonpartisan Committee for a Responsible Federal Budget has warned that the bill would increase federal deficits by $2.8 trillion over the next decade.
Related: Pro Trump Farmers Now Admit They Can’t Find American Workers
A Nation Divided
As the bill heads to the House for further deliberation, the debate over Medicaid cuts underscores a broader divide in American politics.
Supporters argue that the reductions are necessary to streamline a bloated program and fund priorities like tax cuts and border security.
Critics, however, warn of dire consequences for the nation’s most vulnerable, from disabled children to rural hospitals on the brink of closure.
Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) described the cuts as “cruel” and warned that they “will strike a mortal blow to rural health care.”
With the 2026 midterms looming, the political repercussions of this vote are likely to resonate.
As one user on X poignantly noted, “No hearings. No headlines.
Just steel barricades around Treasury, and silence.”
The fight over Medicaid is far from over, and its outcome will shape the nation’s healthcare landscape for years to come.
Back to Daily Market News. ⬅️
Also Read: Democrats Are Now Pushing to Unmask ICE Agents
News For You
Trump Now Freezes Whopping $6.8bn in Federal Education
Former ICE Officer Now Criticizes Brutal SoCal Raids
Senate Now Votes to Cut $930bn From Medicaid, Enrich Wealthy
Big Beautiful Bill: “Rich people won and working families lost”
DOJ Now Announces Plans To Prioritize Cases to Revoke Citizenship
An Aid Network Now Counters ICE Raids in California
Supreme Court Ruling Now Raises Concerns Over Birthright Citizenship
Texas Has Now Quietly Stopped Its $3bn Border Wall Project
Texas Has Now Quietly Stopped Its $3bn Border Wall Project
Powell Says Trump’s Immigration Roundups Will Now Slow The Economy
Economists Are Now on Alert Following Q1 ‘Shrinking’ Economy Data
Tech Layoffs in Bay Area Now Trigger Bankruptcy Surge
Two Tech Titans Now Announce Massive Layoffs Amid AI Adoption
DOGE Layoffs Impact Is Now Leaking Into The Housing Market
The Senate Has Now Endorsed Whopping $5 Trillion Debt Hike
Gas Prices Are Now Expected To Surge Amid Iran Strike
About The Author
